Fix error No. 71 / 1983 Coll.
Editorial Notice on the correction of Printer Errors 1 in Act No. 131 / 1982 Coll., amending and supplementing the Civil Code and adjusting certain other property relations, in Slovak edition and 2nd in the Family Act No. 66 / 1983 Coll. (full text, as follows from amendments and additions made by the Act of 10 November 1982 No. 132 Coll.), in Czech edition
Valid
71
REPORTING
on the correction of print errors
1. in Act No. 131 / 1982 Coll., amending and supplementing the Civil Code and regulating certain other property relations, in Slovak edition; and
2. in the Family Act No. 66 / 1983 Coll. (full text as follows from amendments made by the Act of 10 November 1982 No. 132 Coll.), in the Czech edition
1. (a) Paragraph 12 - Article 132a (1) is to read as follows:
"(1) Kto s vecou pokladá ako so svojou a so reteľom na výtky aktur je dojmyseľný, že mím vec vyší, má - pokiaľnie je uvedených inak - similar rights of protection, aké mé ownné veci."
(b) point 18. - In § 149 (4) at the end of the first sentence, the words "use 'should be correctly used instead of the incorrect word" use'.
(c) point 25. - In the first sentence of Paragraph 221 (1), instead of the wrong term, the term "iba would prevent it..." "correctly used term..." unless they prevented it... "
(d) paragraph 26. - In § 230 (3) of the sentence behind the semicolon, it is correct to say: "but from the waiver without the residual delay, the obligation to pay the organizationa novú price is required, unless the price has been raised after the scheduled time of the service."
(e) Paragraph 43 - Paragraph 453a (1), first sentence, is to read as follows:
"If the owner of the property has committed such unlawful conania, which has permanently deprived himself of the possibility of ordinary use, the property falls into the possession of the štát, pokiaž is in contradiction with the company's interests, so that the owner with the evening dealej oblast."
2. Paragraph 62 (1) should read as follows:
"(1) If the period laid down for the denial of paternity by one of the parents has elapsed, the Prosecutor General, if the interest of the company so requires, may submit a motion to deny paternity against the father, mother and child. '
Editors
Sign in for notes, favorites and notifications
Regulation Information
| Citation | Correction of error No. 71 / 1983 Coll., on the correction of print errors 1. in Act No. 131 / 1982 Coll., amending and supplementing the Civil Code and adjusting certain other property relations, in Slovak edition and 2. in the Family Act No. 66 / 1983 Coll. (full text as follows from amendments and additions made by the Act No. 132 Coll.), in Czech edition |
|---|---|
| Regulation Type | - |
| Author | - |
| Collection | Code of Laws |
| Date of Promulgation | 11.07.1983 |
|---|---|
| Effective from | - |
| Effective until | - |
| Status | Valid |
The regulation text is for informational purposes only.
Comments 0