Government Decree No. 462 / 2002 Coll.
Government Regulation on institutional support for research and development by public funds and on evaluation of research projects
Valid
Regulation
Effective from 08.11.2002
Zobrazeno prvních 200 z celkem 205 ustanovení tohoto předpisu.
Zobrazit celý předpis →
Pro stažení celého znění použijte tlačítko Stáhnout výše.
462
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
of 25 September 2002
on institutional support for research and development from public funds and the evaluation of research projects
The Government hereby orders pursuant to Article 39 of Act No. 130 / 2002 Coll., on the promotion of research and development from public funds and on the amendment of certain related laws (Act on the promotion of research and development) (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") to implement Sections 3 (4), 4 (7), 7 (4) and (5) of the Act:
Terms of reference for the provision and use of institutional support for research and development from public funds
(K § 4 (7) of the Act)
(1) The decision to grant institutional support for research and development from public funds (hereinafter referred to as "institutional support") to a research project pursuant to Article 9 (6) of the Act will be issued by the provider for the entire duration of the research project, in the first year of granting institutional support for the research project no later than 30 calendar days after the beginning of the calendar year.
(2) Institutional support for a research project may be used only in accordance with the recognised costs of a research project ("recognised costs").
(3) Institutional support for specific research in universities is granted at the request of the applicant. The applicant shall submit the application to the provider no later than 60 calendar days before the beginning of the calendar year in which the institutional support is to be granted. An application for institutional support in the calendar year 2003 may be submitted by the tenderer to the provider no later than 30 days after the date of entry into force of this provision. The application shall include the information necessary for the calculation of the amount of institutional support referred to in Article 2 (2).
(4) The provider shall decide on the application referred to in paragraph 3 within 30 calendar days of the beginning of the calendar year in which the requested institutional support is to be granted. The application for the calendar year 2003 shall be decided by the provider within 60 days of the date of entry into force of this provision.
(5) The detailed conditions for the use of institutional support for a research project or specific research at universities shall be determined by the provider as part of the decision to grant institutional support. 1)
(6) The payment of the fee for the participation of the Czech Republic in the international research and development programme or the fee for membership in the international research and development organisation will be made by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (hereinafter referred to as "the Ministry") or by the competent provider in a manner specified in the document establishing the Czech Republic's participation in the relevant international research and development programme or in the relevant document establishing membership in the international research and development organisation.
(7) Institutional support for the reimbursement of the financial contribution from the Czech Republic's resources for the project of international cooperation in research and development under Section 4 (5) (c) of the Act shall be granted at the request of the candidate selected in accordance with the rules of the relevant international cooperation programme in research and development, including always:
(a) the basic identification details of the tenderer by which they are;
1. if the natural person, the name or, where applicable, the name, surname, date of birth and address of the place of permanent residence or residence, unless the applicant has a place of permanent residence in the Czech Republic, or an address for service, if different from the address of the place of permanent residence or residence; where that person is an entrepreneur, also a possible addendum distinguishing the person of the entrepreneur or the type of business relating to that person or the type of business operated by that person, the identification number and address registered in the business register or other legally regulated register as the place of business;
2. if there is a legal person, a company or a name, legal form, address of the registered office or, where applicable, address for service, if different from the address of the registered office, identification number, if any, or similar indication; for a legal person who cannot have an identification number, the State in which it is registered,
3. if it is an organisational component of the Czech Republic or a local authority, its name, identification number, if any, and address of the registered office,
(b) if the legal person or organisational component of the Czech Republic or a local authority is involved, also details of any organisational component, internal organisational unit or part of the tenderer, entrusted with specific legislation, instrument of incorporation, instrument of incorporation or other evidence of the establishment or establishment of the exercise of rights and obligations relating to the resolution of an international cooperation project in research and development or part thereof, if any;
(c) the document or documents, where appropriate, on the acceptance of the candidate's research and development project to be dealt with in the framework of the international research and development cooperation programme and on the amount of the financial contribution of the Czech Republic which can be paid out of public funds; where that document is not drawn up in the Czech or English language or, where appropriate, in another language specified by the relevant provider, an officially certified translation of that document into the Czech or English language,
(d) the signature of the tenderer, if any, or the signature of the person authorised to act as tenderer.
(8) Where the document referred to in paragraph 7 (c) is issued by the provider responsible for deciding on the institutional support provided for in paragraphs 4 (5) (c) and 7 (5) of the Act, which has selected the candidate in accordance with the rules of the relevant international research and development cooperation programme, paragraph 7 (1) shall apply. (c) shall not apply to such tenderers and the provider shall establish the information resulting from the document referred to in paragraph 7 (c) from his official record.
Criteria and procedures for providing and using institutional support for specific research at universities
(K § 7 (4) of the Act)
(1) The conditions for granting institutional support for specific research at higher schools2 (hereinafter referred to as institutional support for specific research) are the following criteria:
(a) in the calendar year preceding the calendar year of granting institutional support for specific research, the university received public support for research and development under the law or legislation in force before the date of entry into force of this Regulation;
(b) in the calendar year preceding the calendar year of granting institutional support for specific research, the university has provided data on the results of research and development supported by public funds in the register of information on the results;
(c) in the calendar year, the provision of institutional support for specific research at a university, students study in the doctoral study programme or in the final year of the Master's study programme.
(2) The contribution of the university to institutional support for specific research at all universities within the competence of the provider shall be determined by the provider on the basis of:
(a) the proportion of aid for research and development granted under the law or the legislation effective before the date of entry into force of this Regulation to a university on the total amount of aid for research and development granted under the law or legislation effective before the date of entry into force of this Regulation to all universities within the competence of the provider, multiplied by the share of aid for research and development with the results shown to be applied to the total aid for research and development of the university;
(b) the participation of students in doctoral study programmes at university in the number of students in doctoral studies at all universities within the competence of the provider;
(c) the participation of graduate students in higher education in the number of graduate graduates in all higher education institutions under the responsibility of the provider;
(d) the proportion of the calculated number of professors at the university in the calculated number of academic staff at the university;
(e) the proportion of the calculated number of university lecturees in the calculated number of university academics.
(3) Institutional support for specific research can be used for research activities involving university students, in particular the reimbursement of:
(a) the personal and material costs of cooperation between students of Master's and Doctor's programmes (hereinafter referred to as "students") in addressing projects and research projects addressed at universities;
(b) the personal and material costs of joint research carried out by academics and students in accordance with the rules laid down by each university;
(c) the cost of research carried out by students in the preparation of thesis or dissertation.
Share of institutional support in recognised costs
(K 7 (5) of the Act)
(1) The share of institutional support in the payment of recognised costs shall be determined by the provider on the basis of the results of the evaluation of the research project under Article 29 of the Act or on the basis of the results of the control under Article 13 of the Act or in connection with the change in the level of recognised costs or the amount of institutional support under Article 9 (7) of the Act.
(2) The share of institutional aid in the reimbursement of recognised costs of a research project may be up to 100%.
Definition of recognised cost items
(K § 8 (1) of the Act)
The following may be included in recognised costs:
(a) personnel costs or expenses of research staff, technicians and other auxiliary staff of the beneficiary or, where appropriate, of a person whose beneficiary is an organisational body, including workers' professions, involved in the management of the research project, including compulsory statutory contributions (3), and the allocation to, or a proportion of, the cultural and social needs fund, provided that the fund is not made up of profit allocations;
(b) the costs or expenses of equipment, machinery, equipment, land and buildings and other tangible and intangible assets used exclusively and permanently for research activities in the direct context of addressing the research project;
(c) other operating costs incurred in the direct connection with the management of the research project, such as material costs, stocks and small tangible assets;
(d) the cost of services directly used to address the research project;
(e) travel refunds (4) and costs of international cooperation directly linked to the resolution of the research plan and the costs of publication of the results of the research project, including the costs of ensuring the rights to research results;
(f) additional (overheads) costs or expenses incurred directly in addressing a research project, such as administrative costs, costs of auxiliary staff and infrastructure, energy and services not referred to in points (a) and (c).
The formalities necessary for the submission of the proposal for a research project
(Paragraph 27 (1) of the Law)
(1) Part of the formalities necessary for the submission of a proposal for a research project is proof of the eligibility of the candidate under Section 28 of the Act. If the applicant submits several proposals for research projects at the same time, he shall demonstrate his competence only once.
(2) The proposal for a research project also contains:
(a) basic information on the tenderer:
1. the nominal composition of the applicant's authorities and the organisational chart with the number of employees;
2. annual activity reports for the last five years, if any;
3. the definition of the share of research and development in the total activity of the candidate, the main research focus of the candidate, the contribution of the candidate to the development of the field in the national and international context, the users of the research and development results carried out by the candidate,
4. a description of the applicant's participation in the implementation of international cooperation in research and development carried out under international agreements binding the Czech Republic, information on the candidate's membership or representatives in non-governmental international research and development organisations and information on the contracts of the candidate for cooperation with foreign research and development organisations;
5. the candidate's research and development budget in the last five years in the structure of institutional support, targeted support and other sources of funding for research and development (indicating the source),
(b) a detailed description of the research project, including the following:
1. the state of the art of knowledge and research in the field covered by the research project from an international and national perspective;
2. the relationship between the research project and the research focus of the candidate and its connection with the long-term development of the candidate's research and development, the applicant's current share of the research project in the national and international context;
3. the key results of the applicant's research and development related to the research project;
4. the subject matter and objectives of the research plan, the strategy, the methods and the timetable for their achievement;
5. the expected results of the research project, including a specification of their nature and substance and a timetable for their intended application;
(c) a description of the personnel security of the implementation of the research project, including:
1. the name of the staff of the tenderer or, where applicable, the person whose candidate is an organisational body who will participate in the management of the research project (hereinafter referred to as the "solution team"), including their work classification, the envisaged core activities to meet the objectives of the research project and the expected working capacity in hours per year;
2. data on the age and qualification structure of the solving team,
3. a list of the most important research and development results of the research project in the last five years;
(d) a description of the spatial and material technical security of the solution to the research project, including a description of the following:
1. the level of security of implementation of the research project within the existing spatial and material technical conditions at the applicant's workplace;
2. the infrastructure, instrumentation and technical equipment necessary to achieve the objectives of the research project;
(e) a description of the financial security of the solution to the research project, including an indication of:
1. recognised costs, their specifications and justification;
2. Specifications of financial resources.
(3) The draft research project shall be submitted in the Czech language, the part of the research project referred to in paragraph 2 (a) (3) and (4) and (b) to (e) shall be submitted simultaneously in the English language.
Procedure for amending the amount of recognised costs or institutional support
(K § 9 (7) of the Act)
(1) A change in the amount of recognised costs or the amount of institutional support may be requested by the beneficiary in writing not later than 60 calendar days before the end of the calendar year preceding the year of the requested change in the amount of recognised costs or the amount of institutional support.
(2) If there is a material change in the circumstances relating to the solution to the research project which the beneficiary could not have foreseen or caused, he shall request that the amount of recognised costs be changed or the amount of institutional support changed no later than 7 calendar days from the date on which he became aware of such facts.
(3) An application for modification of the amounts of eligible costs or the amount of institutional support must contain the elements referred to in Article 5 (2) (b) to (e) of this Regulation.
(4) The provider shall assess the application submitted pursuant to paragraph 1 by the end of the calendar year preceding the year of the requested change in the amount of recognised costs or institutional support. The request submitted pursuant to paragraph 2 shall be assessed by the provider within 60 calendar days of the date on which it received it.
(5) The beneficiary shall not be entitled to change the amount of the costs recognised or the amount of the institutional support referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2. If the provider intends to comply with an application for modification of the amount of recognised costs or the amount of institutional support referred to in paragraph 1 or 2, it shall decide to amend the decision made pursuant to Article 9 (7) of the Law within 30 calendar days of the date of examination of the application. If the provider does not wish to comply with the request for modification of the amount of recognised costs or the amount of institutional support referred to in paragraph 1 or 2, he shall notify the beneficiary within 30 calendar days of the date of examination of the application by communication; no decision on the application shall be taken.
(6) In the event of an increase in the annual inflation rate, published by the Czech Statistical Office, by more than 5%, the provider may adjust the level of recognised costs and the amount of institutional support without the application referred to in paragraphs 1 to 3 and decide to amend the decision made pursuant to Paragraph 9 (6) of the Act on its own initiative.
(7) If the provider finds reasons for withdrawal of the institutional support or part thereof provided for in a specific legislation, 5) he shall immediately initiate proceedings for withdrawal of the institutional support or part thereof under the administrative rules. 6)
How to take over a research project proposal and its records
(Paragraph 27 (6) of the Law)
(1) The provider shall ensure that the submitted proposals for research projects are marked on the envelope with the serial number, date and time of delivery and forwarded with such data to the Commission for the adoption of proposals for research projects (hereinafter referred to as the "Reception Commission") for that purpose by the provider. When a proposal for a research project is received in person, the provider of the research project shall be provided with a certificate of receipt, indicating the information referred to in the first sentence.
(2) The Reception Board shall have at least three members. The members of the receiving committee shall be appointed and removed by the provider from his or her staff and, where appropriate, from the staff of the person to whom the provider is an organisational component.
(3) A member of the Reception Board may not be a member of a provider's staff who, due to his relationship with the research project received or one of the tenderers, may have reasonable doubts as to his unbiased nature.
(4) If a member of the receiving committee finds that he does not comply with the conditions referred to in paragraph 3, he shall not participate in the work of the receiving committee and shall notify the provider which shall withdraw him without delay.
(5) The Reception Board shall draw up a protocol containing in particular the following information on each draft research project:
(a) the name of the research project, its annotation, its classification by code list of scientific fields, the business name or the name of the applicant and the name, surname and, where applicable, academic titles and scientific rank of the natural person responsible for the research project (investigator);
(b) an indication of the service within or after the expiry of the time limit laid down by the provider under the law, including the time limit for service;
(c) an indication of the completeness of the elements of the proposals for research projects; for proposals for research projects which do not meet the requirements laid down, also the reason for exclusion from the evaluation.
(6) The Protocol referred to in paragraph 5 shall be approved by the provider and sent within 7 calendar days of the date of approval of the Ministry. The protocol is part of the evidence of the evaluation of research projects.
Composition of the evaluation committee and conditions of unbiased nature of its members
(Paragraph 29 (2) of the Law)
(1) The evaluation committee shall have at least five members. The members of the evaluation committee shall be appointed by the provider on the basis of the design of the legal entities or organisational units of the Czech Republic (hereinafter referred to as the "organisational component of the State '), which is involved in the resolution of the proposals or results of the research projects under consideration, and may also be withdrawn by the provider; Members shall be appointed in such a way that:
(a) the evaluation committee has representatives of the provider, representatives of natural or legal persons or organisational bodies of the State concerned, or representatives of other legal persons involved in the matter;
(b) the majority of the members of the evaluation committee were not members of the employees of the Czech Republic working in the same organisational component of the State and of the employees of the contributory organisations within the responsibility of the provider; This provision does not apply to the composition of evaluation committees set up to evaluate research and development projects related to defence or security of the Czech Republic.
(2) The number of evaluation committees shall be determined by the provider in such a way that the evaluation committee assesses the research intentions of all candidates or beneficiaries dealing with the same problem in the field, with the exception of those evaluated by the inter-ministerial evaluation committee.
(3) Only a person may be appointed as member of the evaluation committee:
(a) has not been convicted of an intentional offence, (7) if it is not considered as not being convicted; evidence of integrity by an extract from the record of the Register of Penalties, which may not be more than 3 months before the date of appointment as a member of the evaluation committee,
(b) has not been disciplined in the last three years under specific legislation8) governing the pursuit of professional activity, where this activity is related to the subject of the evaluation;
(c) is not simultaneously a member of the Research and Development Council;
(d) is not at the same time a member of more than 2 other evaluation committees or inter-ministerial evaluation committees provided for in Article 29 (4) of the Act.
(4) The members of the evaluation committee shall be appointed for a period of five years, but not more than two consecutive terms of office. The evaluation committee shall elect a chairman from among its members who shall convene it and manage its activities.
(5) Membership of the evaluation committee shall cease to exist
(a) the expiry of the term of office;
(b) resignation at his own request;
(c) deaths;
(d) an appeal by the provider.
(6) The reason for the withdrawal of a member of the evaluation committee by the provider is:
(a) removal or limitation of legal capacity, 9)
(b) final conviction for intentional crime, 7)
(c) failure to fulfil the tasks of a member of the evaluation committee provided for in paragraph 9 and in paragraph 1 of Article 9 or in the Statute of the evaluation committee.
(7) A member of the evaluation committee shall immediately notify the provider of the facts relevant to its membership of the evaluation committee provided for in paragraphs 3 and 6.
(8) The members of the evaluation committee shall attend the meetings of the committee and shall be familiar with all the supporting documents for evaluating proposals or the results of research projects. The candidate or beneficiary shall allow the members of the evaluation committee and the opponents to verify the facts relating to the research project with the candidate or beneficiary.
(9) A member of the evaluation committee shall not be present in the evaluation of the design of the research project or the results of the research project and shall not influence other members of the evaluation committee if, in view of its relationship with the design of the research project or the results of the research project or the candidate, reasonable doubts may be expressed as to its unbiased nature.
How the evaluation committee operates, how the data contained in the proposals for research projects and other elements are handled
(Paragraph 29 (2) of the Law)
(1) The meetings of the evaluation committee shall be private and may be attended only by its members or authorised representatives of the provider. Other persons may attend or be present at the meetings of the evaluation committee only with its consent or with the consent of the provider. The provider shall request from all persons in contact with proposals for research projects, documents on research projects or the results of the evaluation of research projects a written declaration in which they undertake to:
(a) do not provide information on the conduct of the evaluation of the design of the research project or the outcome of the research project to the tenderer or beneficiary;
(b) do not provide other persons with information on proposals for research projects or the results of their evaluation, except to the extent provided for in Article 12 of the Act after their publication by the provider;
(c) shall not provide a copy of the documents for evaluating proposals or the results of research projects;
(d) return the documents for evaluating the proposals or the results of the research projects after processing to the provider or destroy them.
(2) The evaluation committee shall be capable of a quorum if an absolute majority of its members are present. The resolution shall be adopted by an absolute majority of the members of the committee present, meeting the conditions laid down in Paragraph 8 (9). If the evaluation committee is repeatedly unable to reach a resolution, it shall submit to the provider all draft resolutions, including their justification. If requested by a member of the evaluation committee, the opinion of the evaluation committee shall also indicate its opinion different from that of the evaluation committee.
(3) The evaluation committee will recommend to the providers which draft research projects submitted under Article 27 (3) of the Act are to be referred for evaluation by the inter-ministerial evaluation committee.
(4) The provider will decide which proposals for research projects submitted under Article 27 (3) of the Act will be forwarded to the assessment by the inter-ministerial evaluation committee. The provider may decide against the recommendation of the evaluation committee.
(5) The provider shall deliver the draft research projects referred to in paragraph 4 or designated by the Ministry after processing the protocols referred to in Article 7 (6) to the Ministry within 120 calendar days of the beginning of the calendar year in which the draft research projects were submitted to the provider.
(6) In its activities, the evaluation committee shall be governed by the Statute and the Rules of Procedure. The Statute and Rules of Procedure shall be issued by the provider and published at the latest by the deadline for submitting proposals for research projects at his website.
(7) At the end of the evaluation, the evaluation committee shall draw up a report on the evaluation of the design or the results of the research project, which shall include, in particular, the identification data of the research project, the name of the candidate, the recognised costs, the amount of institutional support and the justification for the outcome of the evaluation based on the opinions of the opponents. Protocols for evaluation of proposals or the results of research projects shall be submitted by the evaluation committee to the provider. The provider shall decide on the granting of institutional support. The provider may decide in contravention of the recommendation of the evaluation committee if the decision is justified in writing and annexed to the Protocol.
(8) The service, organisational and financial activities of the evaluation committee are provided by the provider.
(9) The protection of proposals for research projects and the results of research projects under specific legislation10 is not affected.
(10) The provider shall be entitled to publish only the data intended for publication in the procurement documents referred to in Article 27 (2) of the Act, only after the publication of the results of the evaluation of research projects, with the exception of the data on proposals for research projects subject to protection under specific legislation. 11)
Conditions of opposition to the design of the research plan and the candidate and the way in which data contained in the proposals for research projects are handled
(Paragraph 29 (3) of the Act)
(1) An opponent who processes an opposing opinion on a proposal for a research project must not be a person who, because of his or her relationship with the proposal for a research project or with the candidate, has reasonable doubts as to its unbiased nature.
(2) The provider shall request a written declaration by the opponent of his unbiased opposition to the tenderer and the design of the research project, together with a declaration of compliance with the obligations set out in points (a) to (d) of Paragraph 9 (1).
(3) Opponents assessing the same proposal for a research project shall not be employees of the same employer; if their employer is the Czech Republic, they may not work with the same organisational body of the state, unless the evaluation of the research project in the field of defence or security of the Czech Republic is discussed.
(4) A member of an evaluation committee or an inter-ministerial evaluation committee may not be an opponent of a research project which assesses that research project.
(5) If, during the course of the evaluation of the design of the research project, it is demonstrated that the opposition assessment has been carried out by an opponent who does not meet the conditions set out in paragraph 1, neither the evaluation board nor the provider shall take into account the content of the opposition assessment and the provider shall ensure that the new opposition assessment is carried out.
Method of setting up an inter-ministerial evaluation committee to evaluate similar research projects supported by different chapters of the state budget, the way in which it operates and other elements
(Paragraph 29 (5) of the Law)
(1) The inter-ministerial evaluation committee shall examine the proposals for research projects or the results of research projects addressing the same issues identified in accordance with § 9 (4) or determined by the Ministry after processing the protocols pursuant to § 7 (6).
(2) The inter-ministerial evaluation committee shall have at least five members. The Ministry shall appoint the members of the inter-ministerial evaluation committee in such a way as to represent the providers, natural or legal persons or the organisational units of the State or of the local authorities dealing with research and development or other legal entities involved in the matter.
(3) The number of inter-ministerial evaluation committees shall be determined by the Ministry in such a way that the inter-ministerial evaluation committee assesses the research intentions of all candidates or beneficiaries involved in the same field.
(4) Paragraphs 8 (3) to (9) and 9 (1), (2) and (7) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the activities of the inter-ministerial evaluation committee.
(5) In its activities, the inter-ministerial evaluation committee shall be governed by the statute and rules of procedure to be issued by the Ministry in agreement with other providers represented in the inter-ministerial evaluation committee.
(6) The Ministry is responsible for the administrative and organisational work of the inter-ministerial evaluation committee. Financial collateral shall be the subject of an agreement between the Ministry and the providers concerned.
Awards for exceptional research and development results supported by institutional support
(K § 3 (4) of the Act)
(1) An evaluation of exceptional research and development results (hereinafter referred to as "valuation") may be awarded by the provider to a natural person for the result obtained on the basis of the institutional support granted by him, from whose publication, protection under special legislation12) or implementation of which has not been completed for more than 5 years.
(2) The award of the valuation shall be decided by the provider from whose chapter of the State Budget or from whose budget the valuation is paid. The amount to be valued is part of the institutional expenditure of the budget chapter of the provider pursuant to Article 6 (1) of the Act.
(3) The provider shall issue a valuation status setting out in particular the name of the valuation, the largest possible number of valuations awarded, the form of the valuation awarded, the amount of the financial or the value of the valuation in kind, the formalities, the manner and date of submission of the valuation proposals. The valuation status shall be published at the provider's website at least 30 days before the closing date of acceptance of the valuation proposals.
(4) The amount of one financial award or the value of one material award may amount to CZK 100,000.
(5) Valuation proposals shall be submitted by providers or beneficiaries of institutional support at the dates, manner and formalities specified by the provider.
(6) The provider shall appoint its advisory body to assess the evaluation proposals. Only a person who:
(a) have not been convicted of a criminal offence the nature of which relates to the subject of a professional activity, or of an economic or criminal offence against property, 7) if it is not regarded as not being convicted; it demonstrates its integrity by means of an extract from the Register of Penalties, which may not be more than 3 months before the date of appointment as a member of the Advisory Body,
(b) has not been disciplined in the last 3 years under specific legislation governing the pursuit of professional activities, (8) where that activity is related to a proposal for a substantive or financial valuation;
(c) is not a person close by special law to a person proposed for a valuation.
(7) The advisory body shall draw up a report on the proposals for evaluation received. The report shall list the persons proposed for the valuation, recommendation or rejection of the valuation, including its justification, and the draft financial or material valuation.
(8) The deliberations of the advisory body shall be governed by the rules of procedure of the provider. The rules of procedure of the advisory body shall be published by the provider on its website at the latest on the closing date of receipt of the evaluation proposals.
(9) The award of the valuation shall be published at the provider's website.
Efficacy
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication.
Prime Minister:
PhDr. Špidla v. r.
Minister for Education, Youth and Sports:
JUDr. Buzková v. r.
1) Paragraph 14 (3) of Act No. 218 / 2000 Coll., on budgetary rules and on the amendment of certain related laws (budgetary rules).
2) Act No. 111 / 1998 Coll., on higher education institutions and amending and supplementing other laws (Act on higher education), as amended by Act No. 210 / 2000 Coll. and Act No. 147 / 2001 Coll.
3) Act No. 592 / 1992 Coll., on Insurance for General Health Insurance, as amended by Act No. 10 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 15 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 161 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 324 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 42 / 1994 Coll., Act No. 241 / 1994 Coll., Act No. 59 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 149 / 1996 Coll., Act No. 48 / 1997 Coll., Act No. 127 / 1998 Coll., Act No. 29 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 118 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 258 / 2000 Coll. Act No. 589 / 1992 Coll., on Social Security Insurance and Contribution to State Employment Policy, as amended by Act No. 10 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 160 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 307 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 42 / 1994 Coll., Act No. 241 / 1994 Coll., Act No. 59 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 118 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 149 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 160 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 113 / 1997 Coll., Act No. 134 / 1997 Coll., Act No. 220 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 238 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 492 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 118 / 2000 Coll.
4) Act No. 119 / 1992 Coll., on Travel Refunds, as amended by Act No. 44 / 1994 Coll., Act No. 125 / 1998 Coll., Act No. 324 / 1998 Coll., Act No. 333 / 1999 Coll., Act No. 36 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 132 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 220 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 448 / 2000 Coll. and Act No. 445 / 2001 Coll.
5) Article 15 of Act No. 218 / 2000 Coll.
6) Act No. 71 / 1967 Coll., on Administrative Procedure (Administrative Regulation), as amended by Act No. 29 / 2000 Coll. and Act No. 227 / 2000 Coll.
7) Criminal law.
Sign in for notes, favorites and notifications
Regulation Information
| Citation | Government Decree No. 462 / 2002 Coll., on institutional support for research and development from public funds and on evaluation of research projects |
|---|---|
| Regulation Type | Regulation |
| Author | - |
| Collection | Code of Laws |
| Date of Promulgation | 08.11.2002 |
|---|---|
| Effective from | 08.11.2002 |
| Effective until | - |
| Status | Valid |
The regulation text is for informational purposes only.
Comments 0