Government Decree No. 461 / 2002 Coll.
Government regulation on the purpose of promoting research and development from public funds and on competition in research and development
Valid
Regulation
Effective from 08.11.2002
Text versions:
11.03.2008
08.11.2002
Zobrazeno prvních 200 z celkem 205 ustanovení tohoto předpisu.
Zobrazit celý předpis →
Pro stažení celého znění použijte tlačítko Stáhnout výše.
461
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
of 25 September 2002
on the purpose of promoting research and development from public funds and on the competition in research and development
According to Article 39 of Act No. 130 / 2002 Coll., on the promotion of research and development from public funds and on the amendment of certain related laws (Act on the promotion of research and development) (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), the Government hereby orders the implementation of § 3 (4), § 4 (7), § 7 (5), § 8 (1) and (4), § 9 (7), § 19 (1), § 21 (1), (4) and (5), § 22 (7) and § 23 (3):
Terms of reference for the provision and use of dedicated public support for research and development
(K § 4 (7) of the Act)
(1) Provider (1) grants public funding to the beneficiary for research and development (hereinafter referred to as "special purpose aid") where:
(a) the supplier has decided on the outcome of a research and development tender pursuant to Article 21 (7) of the Law or, in the case of a research and development contract under a special law, (2) the tenderer has received notification from the provider of the selection of the most appropriate tender or decision by the provider of the direct award of a small-scale contract or an invitation to a single tenderer to submit a tender;
(b) the eligibility of the selected tenderer has been demonstrated in accordance with Article 18 of the Act, or in the case of a research and development contract, the eligibility of the candidate under special legislation has been demonstrated, 2)
(c) a special purpose aid contract has been concluded pursuant to Articles 9 (1) to (4) and 25 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as "the grant contract") or a contract for the execution of a public contract pursuant to a special law (hereinafter referred to as "the grant contract") or a decision on the granting of special purpose aid pursuant to Articles 9 (5) and 9 (25) of the Law (hereinafter referred to as "the grant decision"),
(d) valid research and development project data (hereinafter referred to as "the project") have been transmitted to the R & D information system and confirmed by the operator and administrator of the data elements and code lists of the R & D information system pursuant to Article 31 (9) of the Act.
(2) The purpose aid may be used by the beneficiary solely in a manner consistent with the recognised costs of the project mentioned in the project proposal and approved by the research and development tender provider ("the eligible costs"). This project, including the indication of recognised costs, is an integral part of the aid contract or decision to grant aid.
Method for determining the proportion of the special-purpose aid in the eligible costs
(Paragraph 7 (6) of the Law)
(1) The proportion of the amount of the special-purpose aid in the eligible costs shall be determined by the provider when the research and development contest is announced, taking into account the approved terms of the programme under the directly applicable European Communities Regulation (3);
(a) in the case of a research and development project for the needs of a provider which is the sole user of its results, in the case of a basic research or applied research project, with the exception of industrial research, the proportion of the special-purpose aid to recognised costs established pursuant to Article 3 of this Regulation may not exceed 100%;
(b) in the case of an industrial research project, the proportion of the special-purpose aid in the eligible costs determined in accordance with Article 3 of this Regulation may not exceed 50%;
(c) in the case of a development project, the share of the special-purpose aid in the eligible costs determined in accordance with Article 3 of this Regulation may not exceed 25%.
(2) In the case of a joint project of legal persons or business natural persons and legal persons or natural persons supported by public funds other than the requested special-purpose aid, the share of the special-purpose aid in recognised costs is determined by including in the special-purpose support of the project the part of the recognised costs resulting from the support of the project from other public funds, the share of the special-purpose aid in recognised costs being assessed separately for each legal person or natural person.
(3) Where a project includes more than one part of research and development, the total proportion of the special-purpose aid in the eligible costs shall be calculated as the sum of the amounts authorised for the amounts of the special-purpose aid, calculated in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2, for each part of the research and development covered by the project.
(4) The proposed share of the special-purpose aid in the eligible costs shall be calculated by the tenderer in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 3 and its quantification shall be an integral part of the project proposal.
(5) The share of the special-purpose aid in the recognised costs of an industrial research or development project established in accordance with paragraph 1 may be increased by the provider:
(a) 20 percentage points if the aid is intended for a small enterprise (3a);
(b) by 10 percentage points if the special-purpose aid is intended for a medium-sized enterprise (3a);
(c) by 15 percentage points, where the project involves real cooperation between at least two personnel and economically independent legal entities or business natural persons, provided that none of them pays more than 70% of the project's recognised costs; and
1. at least one of the legal persons or natural persons doing business is a small or medium-sized enterprise; or
2. cross-border cooperation;
(d) 15 percentage points where the project involves actual cooperation between a legal person or an undertaking of a natural person and a legal or natural person whose main purpose is to carry out research and development and disseminate their results by teaching, publishing or transferring technology which reinvests all profits in such activities or disseminating their results or in teaching, and no person has preferential access to its research capacities or to its research and development results (hereinafter referred to as "research organisation");
1. the research organisation pays at least 10% of the project's recognised costs; and
2. the research organisation shall have the right to publish the results of the project to the extent that they originate from the research it carries out.
The share of the special-purpose aid in the recognised costs of part of the project undertaken by the research organisation may be up to 100% in this case.
(6) The contribution of the special-purpose support to the recognised costs of an industrial research project established in accordance with paragraph 1 may be increased by a provider by 15 percentage points, provided that the results of the project are generally disseminated through technical and scientific conferences or through publication in scientific or professional journals or in sources with open access or through open-source software or open-source software.
(7) The total share of the special-purpose aid for recognised costs established under paragraphs 1 to 6 must not exceed 80% for industrial research and 60% for development.
(8) The specific amount of the special purpose aid for an individual project shall be determined by the provider on the basis of the outcome of the evaluation of the draft project under Article 21 of the Law or on the basis of the result of the control provided for in Article 13 of the Act or in connection with the change in the amount of the recognised costs or the change in the amount of the special purpose aid at the request of the applicant pursuant to Article 9 (7) of the Law.
Definition of recognised cost items
(K § 8 (1) and (4) of the Act)
(1) The eligible costs may include:
(a) personnel or expenditure on research and development staff, academics, technicians and other auxiliary staff of the beneficiary or, where appropriate, the legal person to whom the beneficiary is an organisational body or co-beneficiaries, including staff of the workers' professions involved in the management of the project, and their corresponding costs on compulsory statutory contributions (4) and on the allocation to, or a proportion of, the cultural and social needs fund, provided that the fund is not made up of profit allocations. Personnel costs or expenses may be included
1. salaries or salaries of staff recruited under the employment contract solely for the purpose of dealing with the project;
2. the relevant part of staff wages or salaries, corresponding to their commitment to the project or to the project involved, 5)
3. increasing the variable amount of salary or salary of employees involved in the project management;
4. Other personnel costs or expenses under an agreement on work activities or an agreement to carry out work, concluded in direct connection with the project's solution;
(b) costs or expenses incurred by the beneficiary or co-beneficiaries for the acquisition of tangible property used in the direct connection with the solution of the project, the amount of which shall be determined as follows:
1. the amount of the recognised cost of acquiring long-term tangible property (6) with a fitness period longer than the time of the project's solution or the acquisition of tangible property, the purchase price of which is more than CZK 40,000 and the operating technical function of which is more than 1 year) and at the same time longer than the time of the project's solution, shall be determined according to the formula:
UN = (A / B) x C x D,
where
UN are recognised costs,
And there's a time in the years that the property will be used to solve the project,
B is the fitness period or operational technical function of the property in years, determined in accordance with special legislation, 6), 7)
C is the cost of the property determined under special legislation, 6)
D is the share of the use of the property to solve the project,
2. the cost recognised for the acquisition of fixed tangible property with a fitness period equal to or less than the time of the project's solution or for the acquisition of tangible property the purchase price of which exceeds CZK 40,000 and which has an operational technical function of more than 1 year and equal to or less than the time of the project's solution shall be determined according to the formula:
UN = C x D,
where the symbols UN, C and D have the same meaning as in paragraph 1,
3. the amount of the recognised cost of the acquisition of tangible property not referred to in points 1 and 2 shall be determined in accordance with the formula set out in point 2;
(c) costs or expenses for the acquisition of intangible property
1. with a cost of more than CZK 60,000, the amount of which shall be determined according to the formula referred to in point (b) (2),
2. exclusively used in direct connection with the project solution and not mentioned in point 1;
(d) costs or expenses for the operation and maintenance of long-term tangible assets with a fitness period of more than 1 year, or tangible assets with operational technical functions of more than 1 year, which have not been procured from public funds while being used for the solution of the project and whose purchase price is more than 40 000 CZK, equal to the amount of depreciation corresponding to the length of the period and the proportion of expected use of such assets for the solution of the project;
(e) other operating costs incurred in the direct connection with the project's solution, such as material, stocks and small tangible assets, i.e. only other operating costs held in separate records under special legislation, 6)
(f) costs or expenses of services directly used to deal with a project kept in a separate register on the basis of specific legislation, 6)
(g) costs or expenses for the publication of project results, including costs and expenses for ensuring the rights to such research and development results;
(h) travel refunds in accordance with special legislation8) incurred in direct connection with the project's solution;
(i) additional (overheads) costs or expenses incurred directly in relation to the project's solution, such as administrative costs, costs of auxiliary staff and infrastructure, energy and services not referred to in points (a) and (e).
(2) The method of recording recognised costs is laid down by the beneficiary on the basis of a special legislature6.
Procedure for changing the level of recognised costs or the amount of special-purpose aid
(K § 9 (7) of the Act)
(1) A change in the amount of the recognised costs or the amount of the special purpose aid may be requested by the beneficiary in writing not later than 60 calendar days before the end of the calendar year preceding the year of the requested change in the amount of the recognised costs or the amount of the special purpose aid, unless the provider provides otherwise.
(2) If there is a material change in the circumstances relating to the solution of the project which the beneficiary could not have foreseen or caused, the beneficiary shall ask the provider to change the amount of the costs recognised, to change the amount of the aid or to amend the grant contract or decision to grant the aid in writing no later than 7 calendar days after the date on which it became aware of this fact.
(3) The provider shall assess and decide on the application submitted pursuant to paragraph 1 by the end of the calendar year preceding the year of the requested change in the amount of the recognised costs or the amount of the special-purpose aid. The request submitted pursuant to paragraph 2 shall be assessed by the provider and shall be decided on within 60 calendar days of the date on which it was received.
(4) If there is a material change in the circumstances relating to the solution of a project which the provider could not have foreseen or caused, the beneficiary shall propose a change in the amount of the costs recognised, a change in the amount of the aid or a change in the contract to grant the aid or the decision to grant the aid in writing no later than 7 calendar days after the date on which it became aware of that fact. The recipient shall make written comments on the provider's proposal within 60 calendar days of receipt of the proposal.
(5) The beneficiary shall not be entitled to change the amount of the eligible costs or to change the amount of the special-purpose aid referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
(6) Where the provider agrees to a request from a beneficiary submitted in accordance with paragraph 1 or 2, it shall decide within 60 calendar days of the date of the examination of that request to amend the decision granting the aid or to conclude with the beneficiary an addendum to the grant contract. Where the provider of a request submitted pursuant to paragraph 1 or 2 rejects a beneficiary, it shall notify the beneficiary of this fact within 30 calendar days of the date of examination of the application by written communication; no decision on the application shall be taken.
(7) In the event of a change of recognised costs or the amount of the special-purpose aid fixed for the entire duration of the project, more than 50% shall cease to be granted.
Forms of procurement documents for the announcement of a research and development contest
(K § 19 (1) of the Act)
The procurement documents shall contain:
(a) the subject matter of the competition in research and development and its conditions laid down in accordance with Article 17 (2) of the Law and, where appropriate, Article 22 (3) of the Law;
(b) specifying the items of recognised costs under the terms of the research and development tender;
(c) details of the method for determining the proportion of the special-purpose aid to the eligible costs and comments on the calculation of its amount in accordance with Article 2 and the conditions of the R & D tender;
(d) the requirement to submit a draft contractual arrangement for mutual relations, including relations with the provider, in accordance with Article 9 (4) of the Act in cases where a single project proposal is simultaneously submitted by several tenderers;
(e) other conditions of competition in R & D pursuant to Article 17 (5) of the Law, if they are laid down,
(f) the scope of the required data, forms and instructions for filling them in, the form of processing and presentation of the project proposal, the mandatory annexes to the project proposal;
(g) definition of the scope of data on project proposals and data on tenderers intended for publication;
(h) in the case of the second stage of the R & D tender, requirements for the completion of the project proposal pursuant to Section 22 (6) of the Act;
(i) the place, date and manner of notification of the results of the research and development contest;
(j) the place where information on competition in research and development can be obtained.
Commission for the adoption of project proposals
(Paragraph 21 (1) of the Law)
(1) The Commission for the adoption of project proposals (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission") has at least three members. The members of the commission shall be appointed by the provider's staff provider (or the person whose provider is an organisational entity) or by the legal person with whom the provider has concluded a contract pursuant to Article 23 (1) of the Act and may also be withdrawn by the provider.
(2) A member of the Commission may not be a member of the staff of a provider whose relationship to the project received or to one of the tenderers may give rise to reasonable doubts as to its unbiased nature.
(3) The provider shall request a written declaration from a member of the Commission, within the meaning of paragraph 2, of his unsensitivity to the tenderers and project proposals. Without such a statement, a member of the commission shall not participate in the commission and shall not influence other members of the commission.
(4) If a member of the commission finds that he or any other member of the commission is biased, he or she must notify the provider. A commission member who is biased shall be immediately excluded from the next commission activity, the provider shall withdraw it and appoint a new member of the commission.
(5) An administrative, organisational and financial activity of the commission is provided by the provider himself or through a legal person with whom he has concluded a contract pursuant to Article 23 (1) of the Act. The costs of the provider for the activities of the Commission are part of the costs referred to in Section 3 (2) of the Act.
(6) The Commission shall draw up a protocol showing in particular the following information on each project proposal:
(a) identification of the project proposal, person or persons of the tenderer;
(b) an indication of service within or after the time limit laid down by the provider under the law; in the case of project proposals received after the deadline, also the time-limit for their receipt;
(c) an indication of the completeness of the details of the project proposals as laid down in the procurement documents; for project proposals which do not meet the requirements laid down, also the reason for exclusion from the evaluation.
Expert advisory body for evaluation of project proposals
(Paragraph 21 (4) of the Law)
(1) The expert advisory body for the evaluation of project proposals (hereinafter referred to as the expert advisory body) has at least 5 members. The members shall be appointed and withdrawn by the provider, in particular with regard to the subject matter of the competition in research and development and subject to the principle that:
(a) appoint the members of the provider primarily from among persons who have the expertise to assess project proposals according to the programme's focus;
(b) an absolute majority of members may not be employees of the provider or, where appropriate, employees working in the same organisational component of the Czech Republic;
(c) only one employee of the same legal person may be a member of each expert advisory body, except in the case of persons who are employees of the provider and, where appropriate, of the person whose provider is an organisational component;
(d) a member of the expert advisory body shall not be a member of the Research and Development Council;
(e) the provider shall comply with the proportionate representation of the different types of research and development bodies in the light of their regional representation, and shall ensure that users of the results are represented in the case of applied research or development.
(2) The provider shall issue the rules and procedures of the expert advisory body. The status and rules of procedure of the expert advisory body shall be published by the provider on its website at the latest at the time of the publication of a research and development contest. The list of members of the expert advisory body shall be published by the provider on its website at the latest when the results of the research and development contest are announced.
(3) A member of an expert advisory body may not be a person who, because of his or her relationship with the project proposal evaluated or one of the tenderers, has reasonable doubts as to his or her bias.
(4) The provider shall request a written statement from a member of the expert advisory body of his unbiased nature within the meaning of paragraph 3. Without such a declaration, a member of the expert advisory body shall not participate in the activities of the expert advisory body, in particular the evaluation of project proposals shall not be present and shall not affect other members of the expert advisory body.
(5) If a member of the expert advisory body finds that he or any other member of the expert advisory body is biased, he or she shall notify the provider accordingly. A member of an expert advisory body that is biased shall be immediately excluded from the further activity of the expert advisory body, the provider shall withdraw it and appoint a new member of the expert advisory body.
(6) The results of the evaluation of project proposals shall be included in the minutes of the meetings of the expert advisory body, including the results of voting on projects.
(7) The expert advisory body shall draw up the protocol on the outcome of the evaluation of the project proposal and submit it to the provider. The protocol shall include, in particular, identification details of the project proposal, the candidate's person or persons, the project cost recognised, the recommended amount of the special-purpose support and the justification for the outcome of the evaluation of the project proposal, based on the conditions of the announced research and development contest, as well as the assessment by the candidate of the proposed amount of the special-purpose support and the opinions of the opponents.
(8) For grant projects, the evaluation of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, established in accordance with its Statute or in accordance with the General Council of the Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, is carried out by the Academic Assembly of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. Paragraphs 1 to 5 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the activities of such expert advisory bodies.
(9) Proposals for projects and documentation on projects addressed are subject to protection under specific legislation. 10) The provider shall be entitled to publish only the information intended for publication in the procurement documents provided for in Article 17 (8) of the Act, only after the publication of the results of the research and development tender, with the exception of project proposals and documentation on projects covered by specific legislation. 11) In this context, the provider shall be obliged to request a written declaration on the maintenance of data protection contained in project proposals and documentation on the projects addressed from all persons in contact with them, including opponents and members of the expert advisory body.
(10) The provider ensures the administrative, organisational and financial activities of the expert advisory body.
Conditions of opposition to project design and candidate
(Paragraph 21 (5) of the Law)
(1) An opponent who processes an opposing opinion on a project design cannot be a person who, because of his or her relationship with the project proposal or with one of the tenderers, has reasonable doubts as to his or her bias.
(2) The provider shall request a written statement from the opponent of his unbiased opposition to the project proposal evaluated and the tenderer.
(3) Opponents assessing the same project design shall not be employees of the same employer; if their employer is the Czech Republic, they may not work with the same organisational body of the Czech Republic. This does not apply to evaluation of project proposals in the field of R & D related to defence or security of the Czech Republic.
(4) If, during the evaluation of the design of the project, it is demonstrated that an opponent who does not meet the conditions set out in paragraph 1 has been processed by the opposition, neither the expert advisory body nor the provider shall take into account the content of the opposition opinion and the provider shall ensure that the new opposition opinion is processed.
Procedure of the provider in the second stage of the research and development tender
(Paragraph 22 (7) of the Law)
(1) If, pursuant to Article 22 (4) of the Act, the provider decides to accept a project proposal at the first stage of the research and development competition ("first stage ') and to refer it to the second stage of the research and development competition (" second stage'), he shall invite the tenderer who submitted the project proposal to participate in the second stage within 30 calendar days of notification of the results of the first stage. At the same time, the invitation shall be published by the provider in the same manner and place as the results of the first stage.
(2) The invitation of the provider referred to in paragraph 1 shall include, where appropriate, a requirement for the completion of the project proposal pursuant to Article 22 (6) of the Act, the identification number of the project proposal, the method, place and date of receipt of the procurement documents for the second stage, the competitive and evaluation deadlines (12) for the second stage.
(3) The supplier shall specify in the procurement documents for the second stage:
(a) the structure and scope of the supplementary data of the project proposal necessary to assess the professional quality of the proposed project solution and to assess the feasibility of the proposed solution procedure, taking into account the objectives set out in the project proposal selected at first instance;
(b) the form of processing and submission of supplementary documentation of the project proposal, including forms, instructions for their completion and mandatory annexes;
(c) the location, date and method of submission of the supplementary documentation of the project proposal;
(d) the definition of the scope of data on project proposals and data on tenderers intended for publication.
(4) The provider may withdraw the second stage of the competition in research and development on a proposal from the expert advisory body.
Organisational procurement in research and development by another legal person
(Articles 21 (5) and 23 (3) of the Act)
(1) The legal person responsible for organising a research and development contest must meet the requirements for technical equipment for the acceptance and registration of project proposals and data protection requirements under specific legislation. 13)
(2) The legal person responsible for organising a research and development contest shall keep data on the conduct of the research and development contest in such a way that they cannot be misused. It shall transmit all documents relating to the tender to the provider after the completion of the research and development contest.
Public procurement in research and development
Public procurement in research and development pursuant to § 3 (1) (a) (3) of the Act, which is awarded under special legislation, (2) shall not be subject to the provisions of § 5 to 10.
Award for exceptional research and development results supported by special purpose aid
(K § 3 (4) of the Act)
(1) An award for exceptional research and development results (hereinafter referred to as the "valuation") may be awarded by the provider to a natural person for the result obtained on the basis of the special-purpose aid granted by him, from whose publication, protection under special legislation14) or implementation has not elapsed for more than 5 years.
(2) The award of the valuation shall be decided by the provider from whose chapter of the State Budget or from whose budget the valuation is paid. The amount to be valued shall be part of the special-purpose expenditure of the budget chapter of the provider in accordance with Article 6 (1) of the Act.
(3) The provider shall issue a valuation status specifying in particular the name of the valuation, the largest possible number of valuations awarded, the form of the valuation awarded, the amount of the financial or the value of the valuation in kind, the nature, the manner and date of the submission of the valuation proposal. The valuation status shall be published at the provider's website at least 30 days before the closing date of acceptance of the valuation proposals.
(4) The amount of one financial award or the value of one material award may amount to CZK 100,000.
(5) Valuation proposals shall be submitted by providers or beneficiaries of special-purpose support at the dates, manner and with the formalities specified by the provider.
(6) The provider shall appoint its advisory body to assess the evaluation proposals. Only a person who:
(a) has not been convicted of a criminal offence the nature of which relates to the subject of a professional activity, or of an economic or criminal offence against property, 15) unless it is regarded as not being convicted; it demonstrates its integrity by means of an extract from the Register of Penalties, which may not be more than 3 months before the date of appointment as a member of the Advisory Body,
(b) has not been disciplined in the last 3 years under specific legislation governing the pursuit of professional activities, 16) if this activity is related to a proposal for a substantive or financial valuation;
(c) is not a person close to the person proposed for the valuation under special legislation17.
(7) The advisory body shall draw up a report on the proposals for evaluation received. The report shall list the persons proposed for the valuation, recommendation or rejection of the valuation, including its justification, and the draft financial or material valuation.
(8) The deliberations of the advisory body shall be governed by the rules of procedure of the provider. The rules of procedure of the advisory body shall be published by the provider on its website at the latest on the closing date of receipt of the evaluation proposals.
(9) The award of the valuation shall be published at the provider's website.
Transitional provision
Public research and development competitions announced before the date of entry into force of this Regulation shall be completed in accordance with existing legislation.
Repeal
The following shall be deleted:
1. Government Decree No. 88 / 2001 Coll., on the conditions for the special purpose financing of research and development and the transmission of data to the central register of projects financed from the state budget.
2. Government Decree No. 374 / 2001 Coll., amending Government Decree No. 88 / 2001 Coll., on the conditions for the special purpose financing of research and development and the transmission of data to the central register of projects financed from the state budget.
Efficacy
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication.
Prime Minister:
PhDr. Špidla v. r.
Minister for Education, Youth and Sports:
JUDr. Buzková v. r.
1) Paragraph 2 (2) (a) of the R & D Support Act.
2) Act No. 199 / 1994 Coll., on Public Procurement, as amended by Act No. 148 / 1996 Coll., Act No. 93 / 1998 Coll., Act No. 28 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 256 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 39 / 2001 Coll. and Act No. 142 / 2001 Coll.
3) Council Regulation (EC) No 659 / 1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
(3a) Annex I to Commission Regulation No 70 / 2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises, as amended.
4) Act No. 592 / 1992 Coll., on Insurance against General Health Insurance, as amended by Act No. 10 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 15 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 161 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 324 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 42 / 1994 Coll., Act No. 241 / 1994 Coll., Act No. 59 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 149 / 1996 Coll., Act No. 48 / 1997 Coll., Act No. 127 / 1998 Coll., Act No. 29 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 118 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 258 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 492 / 2000 Coll. Act No. 589 / 1992 Coll., on Social Security Insurance and Contribution to State Employment Policy, as amended by Act No. 10 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 160 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 307 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 42 / 1994 Coll., Act No. 241 / 1994 Coll., Act No. 59 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 118 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 149 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 160 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 113 / 1997 Coll., Act No. 134 / 1997 Coll., Act No. 220 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 238 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 492 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 118 / 2000 Coll.
5) Labour law.
6) Act No. 563 / 1991 Coll., on Accounting, as amended by Act No. 117 / 1994 Coll., Act No. 227 / 1997 Coll., Act No. 492 / 2000 Coll. and Act No. 353 / 2001 Coll.
7) Act No. 586 / 1992 Coll., as amended by Act No. 35 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 96 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 157 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 196 / 1993 Coll., Act No. 149 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 118 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 151 / 1997 Coll., Act No. 149 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 248 / 1995 Coll., Act No. 492 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 117 / 2001 Coll., Act No. 120 / 2001 Coll., Act No. 239 / 2001 Coll., Act No. 453 / 2001 Coll., Act No. 483 / 2001 Coll., Act No. 50 / 2002 Coll., Act No. 128 / 2002 Coll., Act No. 198 / 2002 Coll. and Act No. 210 / 2002 Coll.
8) Act No. 119 / 1992 Coll., on Travel Refunds, as amended by Act No. 44 / 1994 Coll., Act No. 125 / 1998 Coll., Act No. 324 / 1998 Coll., Act No. 333 / 1999 Coll., Act No. 36 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 132 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 220 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 448 / 2000 Coll. and Act No. 445 / 2001 Coll.
9) Act No. 283 / 1992 Coll., on the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, as amended by Act No. 220 / 2000 Coll.
10) For example, Act No. 121 / 2000 Coll., on copyright law, on copyright law and on the amendment of certain laws (Copyright Act), Act No. 101 / 2000 Coll., on the protection of personal data and on the amendment of certain laws, as amended by Act No. 227 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 177 / 2000 Coll. and Act No. 450 / 2001 Coll., Commercial Code.
11) Act No. 148 / 1998 Coll., on the protection of classified information and on the amendment of certain laws, as amended by Act No. 164 / 1999 Coll., Act No. 18 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 29 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 30 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 363 / 2000 Coll., Act No. 60 / 2001 Coll. and Act No. 322 / 2001 Coll.
12) Paragraph 20 of the R & D Support Act.
Sign in for notes, favorites and notifications
Regulation Information
| Citation | Government Decree No. 461 / 2002 Coll., on the purpose of promoting research and development from public funds and on the competition in research and development |
|---|---|
| Regulation Type | Regulation |
| Author | - |
| Collection | Code of Laws |
| Date of Promulgation | 08.11.2002 |
|---|---|
| Effective from | 08.11.2002 |
| Effective until | - |
| Status | Valid |
The regulation text is for informational purposes only.
Comments 0